From: Wakko Warner <wakko@animx.eu.org>
To: Carlos Fernandez Sanz <cfs-lk@nisupu.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 3com issues in 2.6.5
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2004 11:05:41 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040405110541.B22980@animx.eu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <003301c41b18$38ff7f90$1530a8c0@HUSH>; from Carlos Fernandez Sanz on Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 04:13:51PM +0200
> I'm trying to track down my problems with my NIC in 2.6.5 (worked fine in
> 2.4.22). The network "works" but very very slow, and ifconfig shows almost
> the same count in the Tx packet and carrier count:
>
> TX packets:23818 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:23817
>
> dmesg for 2.4.22 and 2.6.5 are almost identical, except for the last lines
> in 2.4.22 (vortex_up, etc). There are no (apparently important) different in
> vortex-diag. mii-diag, however, fails to run in 2.6.5 while it works in
> 2.4.22.
>
> Dumps follow, in case someone can shed light.
>
> (BTW: lsmod in 2.4.22 shows the module as busy (used twice, because I have
> two identical NICs, while in 2.6.5 it seems to be unused - I can unload the
> module with both interfaces up, but obviously as soon as I do that they
> dissapear - I assume this is the intended 2.6 behaviour).
Let me ask you, are you noticing slowness sending or receiving? I'm having
a similar problem (2.4.25 and 2.6.4 is slow). I had upgraded the machine
and kernel at the same time. The nic is a 3c905b+mba nic (it netboots).
Receiving seems fairly quick, but sending seems slow. My definition of slow
is "not to it's full speed". I see about 5mb/sec when I transfer files from
that machine (the disk was capable of 26mb/sec on a file, over network it
was about 5mb/sec) I noticed the nic was sharing an IRQ (12) with the sound
card (not in use at all).
I should downgrade to 2.4.22 to see if I see a difference. Oddly, I had
this same board in another machine (which was upgraded) using a 3c990 nic
w/o problems (kernel 2.6.x). However, I didn't often send files at full
speed either.
--
Lab tests show that use of micro$oft causes cancer in lab animals
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-05 14:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-05 14:13 3com issues in 2.6.5 Carlos Fernandez Sanz
2004-04-05 15:05 ` Wakko Warner [this message]
2004-04-05 15:08 ` Carlos Fernandez Sanz
2004-04-05 15:28 ` Hugo Mills
2004-04-05 15:57 ` Gene Heskett
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040405110541.B22980@animx.eu.org \
--to=wakko@animx.eu.org \
--cc=cfs-lk@nisupu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.