From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263001AbUDEWjN (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Apr 2004 18:39:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263529AbUDEWi2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Apr 2004 18:38:28 -0400 Received: from pop.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:32398 "HELO mail.gmx.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S263542AbUDEWeQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Apr 2004 18:34:16 -0400 X-Authenticated: #12437197 Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2004 00:22:56 +0200 From: Dan Aloni To: Eyal Lotem Cc: Cooperative Linux Development , Linux Kernel List Subject: Re: [coLinux-devel] coLinux benchmarks Message-ID: <20040405222256.GA17572@callisto.yi.org> References: <20040405131520.GA4395@callisto.yi.org> <20040405201139.73032.qmail@web61108.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040405201139.73032.qmail@web61108.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 01:11:39PM -0700, Eyal Lotem wrote: > I think the reason may be that Windows is using the > disks better and making access faster. Perhaps DMA > acceleration or some other feature is turned off on > the Linux host side, making disk access slower on the > Linux side. No Windows was involved with these benchmarks in any way. I ran coLinux on Linux. -- Dan Aloni da-x@colinux.org