From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@in.ibm.com>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
lkml - Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
LHCS list <lhcs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Experimental CPU Hotplug PATCH] - Move migrate_all_tasks to CPU_DEAD handling
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2004 19:47:21 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040407141721.GA12876@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1081315931.5922.151.camel@bach>
On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 03:32:12PM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
> But other tasks can do a getaffinity() on it and see the wrong affinity.
> Probably not a big issue.
hmm .. the fact that getaffinity reads the cpus_allowed mask w/o doing
lock_cpu_hotplug makes it already racy wrt setaffinity?
Maybe it needs to take CPU hotplug sem before it reads the mask?
> I agree with Ingo: it's clever, well done. Minor nitpicks:
>
> +void migrate_all_tasks(int cpu)
> {
> struct task_struct *tsk, *t;
> int dest_cpu, src_cpu;
> unsigned int node;
>
> - /* We're nailed to this CPU. */
> - src_cpu = smp_processor_id();
> + src_cpu = cpu;
>
> Just make the parameter name "src_cpu"?
[snip]
> This comment's very big. They don't need to know all the things we
> don't do. I'd prefer:
>
> /* Force idle task to run as soon as we yield: it should
> immediately notice cpu is offline and die quickly. */
Sure, I will change as per your comments.
I would like to run my stress tests for longer time before I send it
for inclusion (i would be on vacation till next tuesday ..so maybe i will send
in the patch after that!)
--
Thanks and Regards,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri,
Linux Technology Center,
IBM Software Labs,
Bangalore, INDIA - 560017
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-07 14:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-05 12:18 [Experimental CPU Hotplug PATCH] - Move migrate_all_tasks to CPU_DEAD handling Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2004-04-06 0:28 ` Nick Piggin
2004-04-06 1:15 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2004-04-06 1:27 ` Nick Piggin
2004-04-06 1:30 ` Nick Piggin
2004-04-06 16:43 ` [lhcs-devel] " Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2004-04-06 8:37 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2004-04-06 9:26 ` Nick Piggin
2004-04-06 14:56 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2004-04-06 15:04 ` Nick Piggin
2004-04-06 15:20 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2004-04-07 3:54 ` Rusty Russell
2004-04-07 4:11 ` Nick Piggin
2004-04-07 5:01 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2004-04-07 5:32 ` Rusty Russell
2004-04-07 14:17 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri [this message]
2004-04-07 22:55 ` Rusty Russell
2004-04-12 16:08 ` [lhcs-devel] " Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2004-04-06 7:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-04-06 14:53 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
2004-04-06 15:03 ` Srivatsa Vaddagiri
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040407141721.GA12876@in.ibm.com \
--to=vatsa@in.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=lhcs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.