All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@steeleye.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org
Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] rmap: parisc __flush_dcache_page
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2004 18:21:16 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040410012115.GA1285@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040408184245.GO31667@dualathlon.random>

On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 08:42:45PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> But I've an fairly optimal solution for you, you should make it a
> read_write spinlock, with the readers not disabling interrupts, and the
> writer disabling interrupts, the writer of the prio-tree will not take a
> timeslice, the readers instead will take a timeslice, but since they're
> readers and you've only to read in the flush_dcache_page irq context,
> you don't need to disable irqs for the readers.  I don't have better
> solutions than this one at the moment (yeah there's the rcu reading of
> the prio-tree but I'd leave it for later...)

FWIW, agreed.  Past attempts at RCU-based tree algorithms have been
a bit on the complex side.  While I believe that simpler versions are
possible, RCU-based trees should be approached with caution and with
long lead times.

						Thanx, Paul

  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-04-10  1:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-04-08 13:41 [parisc-linux] rmap: parisc __flush_dcache_page Hugh Dickins
2004-04-08 13:41 ` Hugh Dickins
2004-04-08 13:52 ` [parisc-linux] " James Bottomley
2004-04-08 14:16   ` Hugh Dickins
2004-04-08 14:16   ` Hugh Dickins
2004-04-08 14:16     ` Hugh Dickins
2004-04-08 14:40     ` James Bottomley
2004-04-08 14:40     ` James Bottomley
2004-04-08 15:14       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-08 15:28         ` James Bottomley
2004-04-08 15:34           ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-08 15:34           ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-08 15:47             ` James Bottomley
2004-04-08 16:16               ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-08 16:16               ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-08 16:29                 ` James Bottomley
2004-04-08 17:10                   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-08 17:43                     ` James Bottomley
2004-04-08 17:51                       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-08 17:51                       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-08 18:07                         ` James Bottomley
2004-04-08 18:07                         ` James Bottomley
2004-04-08 18:18                           ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-08 18:18                           ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-08 18:28                             ` James Bottomley
2004-04-08 18:28                             ` James Bottomley
2004-04-08 18:42                               ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-08 18:49                                 ` James Bottomley
2004-04-08 18:49                                 ` James Bottomley
2004-04-08 19:02                                   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-08 19:02                                   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-10  1:21                                 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2004-04-10  1:21                                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2004-04-08 18:42                               ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-08 17:43                     ` James Bottomley
2004-04-08 17:10                   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-08 16:29                 ` James Bottomley
2004-04-08 15:47             ` James Bottomley
2004-04-08 15:28         ` James Bottomley
2004-04-08 15:35         ` Hugh Dickins
2004-04-08 15:35         ` Hugh Dickins
2004-04-08 15:35           ` Hugh Dickins
2004-04-08 16:13           ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-08 16:13           ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-08 15:14       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-08 13:52 ` James Bottomley
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-04-08 13:41 Hugh Dickins

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040410012115.GA1285@us.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@steeleye.com \
    --cc=andrea@suse.de \
    --cc=hugh@veritas.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=parisc-linux@parisc-linux.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.