From: Tom Mitchell <mitch48@sbcglobal.net>
To: SELinux <SELinux@tycho.nsa.gov>
Subject: Re: Now that SELinux supports booleans should we replace tunables with booleans?
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 10:53:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040413175338.GA713@xtl1.xtl.tenegg.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <407BF24E.90901@redhat.com>
On Tue, Apr 13, 2004 at 09:59:42AM -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> Ideas?
The fewer decisions the kernel needs to make the better. i.e. The
more decisions and analysis that can be make in advance of loading
policy the better.
--
T o m M i t c h e l l
/dev/null the ultimate in secure storage.
--
This message was distributed to subscribers of the selinux mailing list.
If you no longer wish to subscribe, send mail to majordomo@tycho.nsa.gov with
the words "unsubscribe selinux" without quotes as the message.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-13 17:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-13 13:59 Now that SELinux supports booleans should we replace tunables with booleans? Daniel J Walsh
2004-04-13 17:09 ` Chris PeBenito
2004-04-13 17:53 ` Tom Mitchell [this message]
2004-04-14 13:16 ` Karl MacMillan
2004-04-14 16:19 ` Russell Coker
2004-04-14 17:19 ` Karl MacMillan
2004-04-14 19:50 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
[not found] ` <407DF398.4010405@redhat.com>
2004-04-15 5:28 ` Russell Coker
2004-04-15 14:52 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-04-14 19:58 ` James Morris
2004-04-14 20:19 ` James Morris
2004-04-21 16:05 ` Karl MacMillan
2004-04-13 23:17 ` Russell Coker
2004-04-14 13:11 ` Karl MacMillan
2004-04-14 13:30 ` Stephen Smalley
2004-04-14 14:10 ` Now that SELinux supports booleans should we replace tunableswith booleans? Karl MacMillan
2004-04-14 16:00 ` Russell Coker
2004-04-14 13:38 ` Now that SELinux supports booleans should we replace tunables with booleans? Russell Coker
2004-04-14 14:53 ` Karl MacMillan
2004-08-02 18:53 ` Stephen Smalley
2004-08-02 19:08 ` Stephen Smalley
2004-08-05 12:30 ` Stephen Smalley
2004-08-05 12:33 ` Stephen Smalley
2004-08-05 13:44 ` Daniel J Walsh
2004-08-06 14:04 ` Stephen Smalley
2004-08-06 15:57 ` Now that SELinux supports booleans should we replace tunableswith booleans? Karl MacMillan
2004-08-06 16:20 ` Stephen Smalley
2004-08-09 20:11 ` Stephen Smalley
2004-08-10 6:46 ` Russell Coker
2004-08-10 14:29 ` Karl MacMillan
2004-08-10 14:33 ` Daniel J Walsh
2004-08-10 14:47 ` Karl MacMillan
2004-08-10 14:43 ` Stephen Smalley
2004-08-10 17:06 ` Timothy Wood
2004-08-10 17:20 ` Stephen Smalley
2004-08-10 13:25 ` Daniel J Walsh
2004-08-06 14:02 ` Now that SELinux supports booleans should we replace tunables with booleans? Stephen Smalley
2004-08-06 14:20 ` Joshua Brindle
2004-08-06 14:28 ` Stephen Smalley
2004-08-06 14:38 ` Daniel J Walsh
2004-08-06 15:30 ` Stephen Smalley
2004-08-06 15:36 ` kmacmillan
2004-08-06 14:23 ` Stephen Smalley
2004-08-06 14:40 ` Daniel J Walsh
2004-08-06 15:02 ` Stephen Smalley
2004-08-23 19:33 ` Daniel J Walsh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040413175338.GA713@xtl1.xtl.tenegg.com \
--to=mitch48@sbcglobal.net \
--cc=SELinux@tycho.nsa.gov \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.