From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dave Jones Subject: Re: two test/debug/dump cpufreq modules Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 12:18:06 +0100 Sender: cpufreq-bounces@www.linux.org.uk Message-ID: <20040414111806.GF24970@redhat.com> References: <20040406213436.GA11147@dominikbrodowski.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040406213436.GA11147@dominikbrodowski.de> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: cpufreq-bounces+glkc-cpufreq=gmane.org@www.linux.org.uk Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: cpufreq@www.linux.org.uk On Tue, Apr 06, 2004 at 11:34:36PM +0200, Dominik Brodowski wrote: > I've just uploaded cleaned-up versions of two test modules for cpufreq which > might be of interest for at least some of you. They're under the GPL, of > course, as the MODULE_LICENSE states... > > cpufreq-acpi_pdump > > Dump the ACPI P-States to be found in the _PSS section of the ACPI table, as > well as the contents of the _PCT registers. _PDC capability bits can be > passed as module parameter "pdc=" > > location: http://www.brodo.de/patches/2004-04-06/cpufreq-acpi_pdump.c > > > cpufreq-tsc_test > > Verify that the TSC-based timing code continues to function as expected > after cpufreq transitions by dumping the difference between TSC reads and > PMTMR reads [ACPI Powermanagement-Aware Timer]. Needs ACPI to work properly. > > location: http://www.brodo.de/patches/2004-04-06/cpufreq-tsc_test.c Very nice. The first one looks especially useful. I'm tempted to actually merge these to keep all the modules in one place. Opinions ? Dave