From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: viewprinting processes and process oriented permissions got funded by DARPA Date: 14 Apr 2004 17:28:04 +0200 Message-ID: <20040414152804.GA2180@colin2.muc.de> References: <407C304F.4080804@namesys.com> <407C930D.5010407@namesys.com> <20040414022248.GA92870@colin2.muc.de> <20040414113741.GB15922@alias.nmd.msu.ru> <20040414125340.GA7737@colin2.muc.de> <20040414150052.GB19430@alias.nmd.msu.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 17:28:04 +0200 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040414150052.GB19430@alias.nmd.msu.ru> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Alexander Lyamin Cc: Andi Kleen , Hans Reiser , reiserfs-list@namesys.com > than if its that comfy, i'm just stupid that i dont use it in my day-to-day life. Possible. It depends on what you're doing day-to-day. > and i'll tell you what - there's a lots of distro's (even hatted ones) that may benefit > from that feature but dont using it. > > people are so inert sometimes. > got me ? ;) No, not really. You're saying it's useless because it is not widely used yet? The per process name spaces seem to be not widely used yet, but some of the other features of the namespace architecture are (like --bind mounts). That's probably because the feature only appeared in 2.6 and is still to new. --bind also took some time to catch on after it appeared in 2.4. Anyways I will shut up on this now and not disturb you further in your quest of reinventing the wheel. -Andi