From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexander Lyamin Subject: Re: viewprinting processes and process oriented permissions got funded by DARPA Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 19:53:42 +0400 Message-ID: <20040414155342.GC19430@alias.nmd.msu.ru> References: <407C304F.4080804@namesys.com> <407C930D.5010407@namesys.com> <20040414022248.GA92870@colin2.muc.de> <20040414113741.GB15922@alias.nmd.msu.ru> <20040414125340.GA7737@colin2.muc.de> <20040414150052.GB19430@alias.nmd.msu.ru> <20040414152804.GA2180@colin2.muc.de> Reply-To: flx@msu.ru Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040414152804.GA2180@colin2.muc.de> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Andi Kleen Cc: Alexander Lyamin , Hans Reiser , reiserfs-list@namesys.com Wed, Apr 14, 2004 at 05:28:04PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > > than if its that comfy, i'm just stupid that i dont use it in my day-to-day life. > > Possible. It depends on what you're doing day-to-day. > > > and i'll tell you what - there's a lots of distro's (even hatted ones) that may benefit > > from that feature but dont using it. > > > > people are so inert sometimes. > > got me ? ;) > > No, not really. > > You're saying it's useless because it is not widely used yet? > > The per process name spaces seem to be not widely used yet, but some > of the other features of the namespace architecture are (like --bind > mounts). That's probably because the feature only appeared in 2.6 > and is still to new. --bind also took some time to catch on after > it appeared in 2.4. > > Anyways I will shut up on this now and not disturb you further in your > quest of reinventing the wheel. thanks. actually its a quest for holy grail. -- "the liberation loophole will make it clear.." lex lyamin