From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stefan Traby Subject: Re: I oppose Chris and Jeff's patch to add an unnecessary additional namespace to ReiserFS Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 02:10:38 +0200 Message-ID: <20040428001038.GA6083@hello-penguin.com> References: <1082750045.12989.199.camel@watt.suse.com> <408D3FEE.1030603@namesys.com> <20040426203314.A6973@infradead.org> <408E986F.90506@namesys.com> <20040427183400.A20221@infradead.org> <408E9F42.2080804@namesys.com> <20040427190439.A20646@infradead.org> Reply-To: Stefan Traby Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040427190439.A20646@infradead.org> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Christoph Hellwig , Hans Reiser , Chris Mason , Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, reiserfs-list@namesys.com, akpm@osdl.org On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 07:04:39PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > I also still think someone who does most work in the last years on a fs > (Chris on reiserfs v3) should be considered maintainer, but that's just my > 2cents and I'd rather leave that to you guys. I agree and add my 2cents to this statement. (Euro-cent, so it has a value :) Chris wrote on 5 Apr: "If there is some technical objection to the patches I'd really like to discuss it." Nothing happened since then and I simply do not consider the $600k payment of DARPA for V4 development as a technical objection against work on V3 - but hey - you can always prove me wrong by rejecting Chris patches. -- ciao - Stefan " GNU's Not Unix -- IIS Isn't Secure "