From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rio Martin Subject: Re: Rules for Blocking Proxies...THANKS !! Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 13:53:25 +0700 Sender: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <200404281353.25093.rio@martin.mu> References: <000b01c426f6$cc216f10$36b4fea9@SABNANIS> <200404201537.12472.Antony@Soft-Solutions.co.uk> <000801c42d47$01e04760$36b4fea9@SABNANIS> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <000801c42d47$01e04760$36b4fea9@SABNANIS> Content-Disposition: inline Errors-To: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Netfilter On Thursday 29 April 2004 00:34, Harry wrote: > Hi All, > Many thanks Mr.Antony, Alexix and the rest who helped me with the rule, the > DNAT rule works great!! Was just going thru a website > http://www.antiproxy.com > wow...they have loads of ports thru which proxies can be bypassed?So does > that mean I have to write rules for each of the relavent ports?at the > moment I have just done for port 3128, and blocked the site antiproxy.com > thru squid. > Suggestions are welcome... > Regards > Harry Maybe you should change Policy for FORWARD chain into Default DENY. After that, you can add your allowed connection port list to be allowed. Like port 80,25,53,110,8080,etc.. - Rio.Martin -