From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from galileo.bork.org (galileo.bork.org [66.11.174.156]) by dsl2.external.hp.com (Postfix) with SMTP id D18A448DD for ; Thu, 29 Apr 2004 07:24:38 -0600 (MDT) Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 09:24:38 -0400 From: Martin Hicks To: Carlos O'Donell Subject: Re: [parisc-linux] A job for a debian-developer? Message-ID: <20040429132438.GB16062@localhost> References: <20040428180741.GH6936@baldric.uwo.ca> <20040428225420.GB21045@localhost> <20040428231610.GK6936@baldric.uwo.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20040428231610.GK6936@baldric.uwo.ca> Cc: parisc-linux@lists.parisc-linux.org List-Id: parisc-linux developers list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 07:16:10PM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 06:54:20PM -0400, Martin Hicks wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 02:07:41PM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > > > > > > parisc-linux, > > > > > > Do we know if any programs use K_INLINE_SYSCALL from our > > > linux/include/asm-parisc/unistd.h, or rather all the _syscall[n] macros? > > > > > > It's rather wrong. Even if I were to correct the issue, I'm curious if > > > anything uses these definitions. > > > > klibc uses the _syscall[n] stuff. > > I don't even know if we have a klibc port? :) > I'll check both out. Thanks Martin. I did the initial work, and kyle fixed it up and sent the patch to hpa. That was probably three weeks ago. mh -- Martin Hicks || mort@bork.org || PGP/GnuPG: 0x4C7F2BEE