From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Fasheh Date: Thu Apr 29 12:34:24 2004 Subject: [Ocfs2-devel] What's your opinion on the patch to fix bug 58 for kernel 2.6 porting? In-Reply-To: <37FBBA5F3A361C41AB7CE44558C3448E03B65E90@PDSMSX403.ccr.corp.intel.com> References: <37FBBA5F3A361C41AB7CE44558C3448E03B65E90@PDSMSX403.ccr.corp.intel.com> Message-ID: <20040429173135.GC9043@ca-server1.us.oracle.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com Well, to be perfectly honest I don't think this is the right solution. Instead of peppering the code with signal stuff, why not try to figure out what the timing issue is (it seems that the umount thread should wait on pending operations) and fix it that way? --Mark On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 10:10:56AM +0800, Zhang, Sonic wrote: > Hi Mark, > > Do you have any opinion on the patch to fix bug 58 for kernel > 2.6 porting? > Could you add the patch into the source tree? > > Thank you. > > > ********************************************* > Sonic Zhang > Software Engineer > Intel China Software Lab > Tel: (086)021-52574545-1667 > iNet: 752-1667 > ********************************************* > > _______________________________________________ > Ocfs2-devel mailing list > Ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com > http://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-devel -- Mark Fasheh Software Developer, Oracle Corp mark.fasheh@oracle.com