From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Cc: erikj@subway.americas.sgi.com, chrisw@osdl.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Process Aggregates (PAGG) support for the 2.6 kernel
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 21:29:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040429192909.GA29725@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040429122026.2ad7884e.pj@sgi.com>
On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 12:20:26PM -0700, Paul Jackson wrote:
> > - without any user merging doesn't make sense
>
> Could you try restating this particular comment, Christoph?
> I am failing to make any sense of it.
without merging anything that actually uses pagg getting pagg itself
into the kernel doesn't make a lot of sense.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-29 19:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-26 22:04 [PATCH] Process Aggregates (PAGG) support for the 2.6 kernel Erik Jacobson
2004-04-26 23:39 ` Chris Wright
2004-04-27 0:36 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-04-27 0:41 ` Chris Wright
2004-04-27 21:00 ` Erik Jacobson
2004-04-27 21:05 ` Chris Wright
2004-04-29 21:10 ` Rik van Riel
2004-04-27 20:51 ` Erik Jacobson
2004-04-27 22:28 ` Chris Wright
2004-04-28 14:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-04-29 19:20 ` Paul Jackson
2004-04-29 19:27 ` Chris Wright
2004-04-29 19:29 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2004-04-29 19:34 ` Paul Jackson
2004-04-29 19:53 ` Erik Jacobson
2004-04-29 21:20 ` Rik van Riel
2004-04-30 6:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-04-30 11:08 ` Guillaume Thouvenin
2004-04-30 18:00 ` Shailabh
2004-04-30 18:28 ` Rik van Riel
2004-04-30 12:54 ` Rik van Riel
2004-04-30 13:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-04-30 13:28 ` Chris Mason
2004-04-30 16:50 ` Shailabh
2004-04-30 15:22 ` Rik van Riel
2004-04-30 16:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-04-30 17:53 ` Shailabh
2004-04-30 18:15 ` Chris Wright
2004-04-30 15:59 ` Chris Wright
2004-04-30 8:54 ` Guillaume Thouvenin
2004-05-20 21:16 ` Erik Jacobson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040429192909.GA29725@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=chrisw@osdl.org \
--cc=erikj@subway.americas.sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pj@sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.