From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>
Subject: Re: I oppose Chris and Jeff's patch to add an unnecessary additional namespace to ReiserFS
Date: Sat, 1 May 2004 23:14:12 -0500
Message-ID: <200405012314.12973.rob@landley.net>
References: <1082750045.12989.199.camel@watt.suse.com> <20040427183400.A20221@infradead.org> <408E9F42.2080804@namesys.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <reiserfs-list-return-18404-reiserfs=m.gmane.org@namesys.com>
list-help: <mailto:reiserfs-list-help@namesys.com>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:reiserfs-list-unsubscribe@namesys.com>
list-post: <mailto:reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Errors-To: flx@namesys.com
In-Reply-To: <408E9F42.2080804@namesys.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
List-Id: <reiserfs-devel.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Chris Mason <mason@suse.com>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, reiserfs-list@namesys.com, akpm@osdl.org

On Tuesday 27 April 2004 12:58, Hans Reiser wrote:
> V4 fixed all of V3's serious performance flaws, and totally obsoletes
> it.    I am very happy with it.

If you consider V3 obsolete and no longer want to maintain it, why don't you 
hand the maintainership over to somebody else then?

Rob