From: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: vandrove@vc.cvut.cz, cw@f00f.org, koke@amedias.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: strange delays on console logouts (tty != 1)
Date: Sun, 2 May 2004 09:17:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040502091751.B9605@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040502011337.2b0b3ca3.akpm@osdl.org>; from akpm@osdl.org on Sun, May 02, 2004 at 01:13:37AM -0700
On Sun, May 02, 2004 at 01:13:37AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, May 01, 2004 at 06:03:47PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > Petr Vandrovec <vandrove@vc.cvut.cz> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > (2) tty hangup is scheduled for work_queue.
> > >
> > > This is the problem, isn't it?
> > >
> > > >From what context is tty_hangup() invoked? (stick a dump_stack() in there>?)
> >
> > >From IRQ context. It's tty_vhangup() which is invoked from user context,
> > and calls do_tty_hangup() synchronously.
> >
>
> But Chris and Petr are talking about virtual terminals on the local
> console, are they not?
>
> If so, how is tty_hangup() getting involved?
The only way it could be invoked is via SAK, which obviously isn't
happening here.
However, login _does_ call sys_vhangup() which in turn calls tty_vhangup()
so I suspect that the statement "tty hangup is scheduled for work_queue"
is based on the _assumption_ that sys_vhangup() calls tty_hangup()
rather than the function it actually does.
--
Russell King
Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/
maintainer of: 2.6 PCMCIA - http://pcmcia.arm.linux.org.uk/
2.6 Serial core
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-05-02 8:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-30 19:53 strange delays on console logouts (tty != 1) Jorge Bernal
2004-05-01 21:46 ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-05-01 23:24 ` Petr Vandrovec
2004-05-01 23:44 ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-05-02 0:36 ` Petr Vandrovec
2004-05-02 0:45 ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-05-02 13:54 ` Andries Brouwer
2004-05-02 1:03 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-02 8:00 ` Russell King
2004-05-02 8:13 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-02 8:17 ` Russell King [this message]
2004-05-02 9:37 ` Russell King
2004-05-02 10:17 ` Russell King
2004-05-02 12:01 ` Petr Vandrovec
2004-05-02 17:53 ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-05-02 18:01 ` Russell King
2004-05-02 18:19 ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-05-02 18:04 ` Russell King
2004-05-01 22:20 ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-05-02 0:26 ` Jorge Bernal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040502091751.B9605@flint.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=cw@f00f.org \
--cc=koke@amedias.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vandrove@vc.cvut.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.