From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm@atrpms.net>
Subject: Re: An offer to host autofs.org
Date: Tue, 4 May 2004 02:32:14 +0200
Sender: autofs-bounces@linux.kernel.org
Message-ID: <20040504003214.GA31852@neu.nirvana>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0405032046130.3257@donald.themaw.net>
	<20040503175506.GA14889@sun.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============12113427273742716=="
Return-path: <autofs-bounces@linux.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20040503175506.GA14889@sun.com>
List-Id: <autofs.vger.kernel.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs>,
	<mailto:autofs-request@linux.kernel.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://linux.kernel.org/pipermail/autofs>
List-Post: <mailto:autofs@linux.kernel.org>
List-Help: <mailto:autofs-request@linux.kernel.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs>,
	<mailto:autofs-request@linux.kernel.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: autofs-bounces@linux.kernel.org
To: Tim Hockin <thockin@sun.com>
Cc: autofs mailing list <autofs@linux.kernel.org>, raven@themaw.net


--===============12113427273742716==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j"
Content-Disposition: inline


--nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi,

On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 10:55:06AM -0700, Tim Hockin wrote:
> On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 08:58:35PM +0800, raven@themaw.net wrote:
> > Axel Thim of ATrpms.net has contacted us and offered to fund the domain=
=20
> > autofs.org and provide web, lists, CVS/subversion infrastructure under =
the=20
> > same resourse structure as ATrpms.org.
>=20
> what's wrong with sf.net?

Nothing per se. sf.net would also be something to consider. Pro/Cons
are

+ sf.net has infrastructure in place for setting up projects with the
  above mentioned resources
+ guaranteed independence of any resource manager
+ mirroring inclusive
- No subversion (yet?)
- Anon CVS lagging behind
- list management could be better
- bug reporting system (if used at all) is not as good as a bugzilla
  instance (depending on taste).

In general a custom setup offers more flexibility and I could confirm
that the hosting site would run autofs itself ;)

I could also setup a wiki.autofs.org to have users contribute
documentation, example setups etc.

Anyway that would be just a way to say thanks for us using autofs4 :)
--=20
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net

--nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAluSNQBVS1GOamfERAsmGAJ49HajxnaUm1lbIDNOpbHKFVu0fVwCeOb4K
Vuk+pjI+4WAPxGAmXPHffs4=
=sjew
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j--


--===============12113427273742716==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
autofs mailing list
autofs@linux.kernel.org
http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/autofs

--===============12113427273742716==--