> Blaisorblade wrote:



> Yes, what I mean is that the proper fix is probably to make
it use the kernel 

> headers as it did before. Would you post the output of the
failing make 

> command with the V=1 option added, to see the actual build
command?



Attached is the orgianl fail (before trying the symlink in /usr/include)
with V=1 as uml-2.6.6-rc3-V.log



Also, attached is the new fail (after trying the symlink in /usr/include)
with an V=1 as uml-2.6.6-rc3.log



> I think the 2nd thing holds, and that my suggestions is a workaround
that 

> should work (I hope)...



Don't look like it.



George



----------------------------------------

Single? Find Christian Singles like you!

http://www.praize.com/singles/