From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264526AbUEJPUP (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 May 2004 11:20:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264634AbUEJPUP (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 May 2004 11:20:15 -0400 Received: from phoenix.infradead.org ([213.86.99.234]:60428 "EHLO phoenix.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264526AbUEJPUN (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 May 2004 11:20:13 -0400 Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 16:20:12 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.6-mm1 Message-ID: <20040510162012.B3856@infradead.org> Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20040510024506.1a9023b6.akpm@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20040510024506.1a9023b6.akpm@osdl.org>; from akpm@osdl.org on Mon, May 10, 2004 at 02:45:06AM -0700 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Btw, one more thing as you're probably sending the i_shared_sem re- spinlockification to Linus just about now: as we're renaming the thing anyway can we give it a less confusing name like i_mmap_lock? It's not been about shared mapping only for ages.