From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Branden Robinson Subject: Re: Fwd: reiser4 non-free? Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 12:59:34 -0500 Message-ID: <20040510175934.GF8186@deadbeast.net> References: <13518599fb1119aa327235ecc3e01dc7@bouncing.localnet> <40974BB9.1000509@gmx.net> <4097C2E8.2030409@namesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="7mxbaLlpDEyR1+x6" Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4097C2E8.2030409@namesys.com> List-Id: To: debian-legal@lists.debian.org, reiserfs-list@namesys.com --7mxbaLlpDEyR1+x6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 09:20:56AM -0700, Hans Reiser wrote: > Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > >>It seems an apt description of how some XFree86 developers reacted to > >>questions. They went dumb. Other XFree86 developers were helpful, but > >>they are not the reason I plan to stop using it, so I do not blame them. > >> =20 > >> > I understand why they lost interest in talking to persons who cannot=20 > grasp that distros removed mention of them from their man pages and this= =20 > was wrong. Does someone have a cite for this? This is the first I've heard of such a thing being done to the XFree86 software distribution. --=20 G. Branden Robinson | Good judgement comes from Debian GNU/Linux | experience; experience comes from branden@debian.org | bad judgement. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Fred Brooks --7mxbaLlpDEyR1+x6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkCfwwUACgkQ6kxmHytGonzsyACggAcA8PfLM5e1PFF1LsEpc/1t nxIAnRbEGUhyECj1fPFskVsWPT6aV+Ob =Bev9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --7mxbaLlpDEyR1+x6--