From: raptor <raptor@tvskat.net>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [LARTC] is 2.6 server ready...
Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 19:13:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040511005101.3cfcbf66@vr> (raw)
hi,
I still dont use 2.6 and udev ... is it ready for use by servers...
I'm happy with my current 2.4 servers...and I want to know will
using 2.6&udev will give me some benefits on network (tcp/ip) oriented
server, I mean :
QoS (tc, HTB), ip route, iptables server...
most of the reviews of 2.6 expose advances in VM,FS etc...
at least when comparing the speed and scalability ...
BUT I'm interested in its NETWORK PEROFORMANCE ..
can u give me some clue is it worthfull to step to 2.6..
Also is there any quircks .
Some links to tests .
tia
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
reply other threads:[~2004-05-10 19:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040511005101.3cfcbf66@vr \
--to=raptor@tvskat.net \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.