From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Boxman Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 21:59:36 +0000 Subject: Re: [LARTC] HTB MPU Message-Id: <200405131759.36895.jasonb@edseek.com> List-Id: References: <40A37E1B.8060604@dsl.pipex.com> In-Reply-To: <40A37E1B.8060604@dsl.pipex.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: lartc@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 13 May 2004 13:28, Andreas Klauer wrote: > Am Thursday 13 May 2004 16:38 schrieb Andreas Klauer: > > Am Thursday 13 May 2004 15:54 schrieb Andy Furniss: > > > I've just noticed that there is a patch on devik's site which does mpu > > > and overhead. > > > > I'll give it a try. Thanks for the hint. > > Well, patching was a little difficult... it didn't like the debian patch > and I didn't succeed in joining the two patches together because of the > weird inject stuff. But anyway. It seems to work, and it looks useful, so > I added it to the "Hacks" section of my Fair NAT script together with a > patched binary. Nifty. But how do you determine what your minimum packet unit (MPU) is? How about overhead for a PPPoE connection? With shaping I can max my upstream and still maintain ~ 120ms ping times, but I'd like to get it down to around ~ 70ms. > Andreas _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/