From: Jason Boxman <jasonb@edseek.com>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] HTB, MPU, and suitable values
Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 22:04:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200405171804.28712.jasonb@edseek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200405171634.02092.jasonb@edseek.com>
On Monday 17 May 2004 17:23, Ed Wildgoose wrote:
<snip>
> Read the follows to that post as well. Basically it's only an
> approximation. The "MPU" is basically pointing out that your ADSL
> stream is encapsulated in an ATM stream. ATM uses fixed size 64 byte
> packets. You need at least 2 of these, hence the 108 figure for MPU.
> Now you also need to estimate overhead which is going to be the size of
> the header on those ATM packets.
Now I'm confused. Is it 53 bytes or 64 bytes?
http://www.faqs.org/docs/Linux-HOWTO/ADSL-Bandwidth-Management-HOWTO.html
> However, that still leaves the "wasted space" on the end of small
> packets (eg those that take up 2.5 ATM cells, how much does the 0.5 take
> up).
>
> I suggested a crude way to tweak that patch (easy to see how it works if
> you look at the relevant lines in the orig file). However, I dont even
> have a working QOS system so I haven't even compiled it! Look up the
> specs for ATM though and you should be able to tweak that suggested line
> change and get something.
So the patch is supposed to increase the cost of dequeuing packets, then,
provided you know what numbers to use?
> I for one would be really interested to hear if it solves the problem!
>
> Ed W
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-05-17 22:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-05-17 20:34 [LARTC] HTB, MPU, and suitable values Jason Boxman
2004-05-17 21:23 ` Ed Wildgoose
2004-05-17 22:04 ` Jason Boxman [this message]
2004-05-18 6:38 ` Ed Wildgoose
2004-05-25 19:48 ` Andreas Klauer
2004-05-25 21:35 ` Ed Wildgoose
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200405171804.28712.jasonb@edseek.com \
--to=jasonb@edseek.com \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.