From: Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>,
paulmck@us.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RCU scaling on large systems
Date: Tue, 18 May 2004 08:33:05 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040518133305.GA4848@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040517144228.7172d681.akpm@osdl.org>
On Mon, May 17, 2004 at 02:42:28PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, May 07, 2004 at 04:32:35PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The calls to RCU are coming from here:
> > > >
> > > > [11]kdb> bt
> > > > Stack traceback for pid 3553
> > > > 0xe00002b007230000 3553 3139 1 11 R 0xe00002b0072304f0 *ls
> > > > 0xa0000001000feee0 call_rcu
> > > > 0xa0000001001a3b20 d_free+0x80
> > > > 0xa0000001001a3ec0 dput+0x340
> > > > 0xa00000010016bcd0 __fput+0x210
> > > > 0xa00000010016baa0 fput+0x40
> > > > 0xa000000100168760 filp_close+0xc0
> > > > 0xa000000100168960 sys_close+0x180
> > > > 0xa000000100011be0 ia64_ret_from_syscall
> > > >
> > > > I see this same backtrace from numerous processes.
> > >
> > > eh? Why is dput freeing the dentry? It should just be leaving it in cache.
> > >
> > > What filesystem is being used? procfs?
> >
> > deleting entries from dcache can be a frequent operation, even rename()
> > triggers d_free.
>
> This issue has gone all quiet. Is anyone doing aything?
I plan to look into the RCU scaling issues (unless someone beats me to
it) but it will be a couple of weeks before I can start.
>
> > note that I changed my tree to free all negative entries that are
> > currently generated by unlink. I find useless to leave negative dentries
> > after "unlink". I leave them of course after a failed lookup (that's the
> > fundamental usage of the negative dentries for the PATHs userspace
> > lookups), but not after unlink.
>
> Sounds sensible. Could you please send out the patch?
>
> > RCU basically trades mugh higher performance for reader, with much lower
> > performance for the writer.
>
> If the writer wants synchronous-removal semantics, yes.
>
> The problem here and, I believe, in the route cache is in finding a balance
> between the amount of storage and the frequency of RCU callback runs.
--
Thanks
Jack Steiner (steiner@sgi.com) 651-683-5302
Principal Engineer SGI - Silicon Graphics, Inc.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-05-18 13:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-05-01 12:08 RCU scaling on large systems Jack Steiner
2004-05-01 21:17 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-05-01 22:35 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-05-02 1:38 ` Jack Steiner
2004-05-07 17:53 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-05-07 18:17 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-05-07 19:59 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-05-07 20:49 ` Jack Steiner
2004-05-02 18:28 ` Paul E. McKenney
2004-05-03 16:39 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-05-03 20:04 ` Paul E. McKenney
2004-05-03 18:40 ` Jack Steiner
2004-05-07 20:50 ` Paul E. McKenney
2004-05-07 22:06 ` Jack Steiner
2004-05-07 23:32 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-08 4:55 ` Jack Steiner
2004-05-17 21:18 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-05-17 21:42 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-17 23:50 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-05-18 13:33 ` Jack Steiner [this message]
2004-05-18 23:13 ` Matt Mackall
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-05-20 11:36 Manfred Spraul
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040518133305.GA4848@sgi.com \
--to=steiner@sgi.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.