From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264186AbUESORy (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 May 2004 10:17:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264192AbUESORy (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 May 2004 10:17:54 -0400 Received: from ipcop.bitmover.com ([192.132.92.15]:46804 "EHLO work.bitmover.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264186AbUESORw (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 May 2004 10:17:52 -0400 Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 07:16:48 -0700 From: Larry McVoy To: Christoph Hellwig , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: bk-3.2.0 released Message-ID: <20040519141648.GB18977@work.bitmover.com> Mail-Followup-To: Larry McVoy , Christoph Hellwig , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20040518233238.GC28206@work.bitmover.com> <20040519075128.A19221@infradead.org> <20040519140259.GA18977@work.bitmover.com> <20040519141115.GO1912@lug-owl.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040519141115.GO1912@lug-owl.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 04:11:15PM +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: > On Wed, 2004-05-19 07:02:59 -0700, Larry McVoy > wrote in message <20040519140259.GA18977@work.bitmover.com>: > > On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 07:51:28AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 04:32:38PM -0700, Larry McVoy wrote: > > > > > BK/Pro 3.2.0 has been released and is in the BK download area, > > > And what makes this relevant for lkml? I'm happy BK user, but this just > > > seems to be compltely offtopic here.. > > > > It would be nice if you suggested a better approach, I'm at a loss as to > > how to keep everyone happy. > > Just create a bk-announce mailing list... News for those that want to > read them, and even an archive of bk's timeline. There is one, it was copied on the mail, but lots of people who use BK for the kernel aren't on it. I don't see the problem. What's the big deal about a post that says a new version of a widely used tool is available? If someone posted that there is a new version of gcc available is that off topic? -- --- Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitkeeper.com