From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: maximilian attems Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 15:57:37 +0000 Subject: Re: [Kernel-janitors] [PATCH] yield() replaced with Message-Id: <20040524155737.GL1949@sputnik.stro.at> MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8221421934479376==" List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: To: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org --===============8221421934479376== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, 24 May 2004, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 12:46:57PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote: > > hello greg, > > > > On Thu, 20 May 2004, Greg KH wrote: > > > > > On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 01:41:11PM -0700, Randy.Dunlap wrote: > > > > For some of these, a new function that was just added might be > > > > the appropriate kernel API to use. Look at msleep() [merged > > > > 2004-may-18] to see if it can be used. It's in include/linux/delay.h > > > > in a kernel bk pull or bk patch and will be in 2.6.7. > > > > > > I agree, most of the longer delays in the kernel can be converted to use > > > msleep() as it will work properly. Yet another thing to add to the > > > janitor list :) > > > > please detail functionnames of these longer delays for the TODO? > > > > does it affect the patches from Gustavo Franco? > > yield-* in http://debian.stro.at/kjt/2.6.7-rc1-kjt1/split/ > > Yes it does, they should use msleep() instead of creating their own > (incorrect) function. ok cool, added item to latest kj TODO. thanks maks --===============8221421934479376== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Kernel-janitors mailing list Kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors --===============8221421934479376==--