From: Martin Zwickel <martin.zwickel@technotrend.de>
To: lm240504@comcast.net
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Invisible threads in 2.6
Date: Tue, 25 May 2004 09:03:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040525090302.66ac23bf@phoebee> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <052520040221.14460.40B2AD9F00067A620000387C2200735834CBCFCACFCBCD0304@comcast.net>
On Tue, 25 May 2004 02:21:19 +0000
lm240504@comcast.net bubbled:
> I've been experimenting with process/thread accounting in 2.6.x,
> and found this strange situation: if the leader thread of a multi-threaded
> process terminates, the other threads become undetectable. After the
> main thread becomes a zombie, /proc/<tgid>/task returns ENOENT on
> open. If you happen to know the TID, you can access /proc/<tid>/* directly,
> but otherwise, there is no way to observe the remaining threads, as far as
> I can see. Consider this program, for example:
>
> #include <pthread.h>
>
> void *run(void *arg)
> {
> for(;;);
> }
>
> int main()
> {
> pthread_t t;
> int i;
> for (i = 0; i < 10; ++i)
> pthread_create(&t, NULL, run, NULL);
> pthread_exit(NULL);
> }
>
> When I run it, the system (predictably) goes to ~100% CPU utilization,
> but there seems to be no way to find out who is hogging the CPU with
> top(1), ps(1), or anything else. All they can show is the main thread in
> zombie state, consuming 0% CPU.
>
> I'm not sure how to fix this (the pid_alive() test seems to be there for a
> reason), but it doesn't seem right. Any thoughts?
my kernel:
# cat /proc/version
Linux version 2.6.6-rc3-mm2 (root@phoebee) (gcc version 3.3.2 20031218 (Gentoo
Linux 3.3.2-r5, propolice-3.3-7)) #6 Fri May 7 10:56:06 CEST 2004
I just compiled your example and ran it:
# ./thread_test
# ps axw
...
12069 pts/175 S+ 0:00 ./thread_test
12070 pts/175 S+ 0:00 ./thread_test
12071 pts/175 R+ 0:06 ./thread_test
12072 pts/175 R+ 0:06 ./thread_test
12073 pts/175 R+ 0:06 ./thread_test
12074 pts/175 R+ 0:06 ./thread_test
12075 pts/175 R+ 0:06 ./thread_test
12076 pts/175 R+ 0:06 ./thread_test
12077 pts/175 R+ 0:06 ./thread_test
12078 pts/175 R+ 0:06 ./thread_test
12079 pts/175 R+ 0:06 ./thread_test
12080 pts/175 R+ 0:06 ./thread_test
...
# top
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
12072 root 25 0 83736 420 1380 R 12.1 0.1 0:16.94 thread_test
12075 root 25 0 83736 420 1380 R 12.1 0.1 0:16.93 thread_test
12073 root 25 0 83736 420 1380 R 11.0 0.1 0:16.92 thread_test
12074 root 25 0 83736 420 1380 R 11.0 0.1 0:16.92 thread_test
12076 root 25 0 83736 420 1380 R 11.0 0.1 0:16.82 thread_test
12077 root 25 0 83736 420 1380 R 11.0 0.1 0:16.87 thread_test
12078 root 25 0 83736 420 1380 R 11.0 0.1 0:16.84 thread_test
12071 root 25 0 83736 420 1380 R 9.9 0.1 0:16.95 thread_test
12079 root 25 0 83736 420 1380 R 7.7 0.1 0:16.80 thread_test
...
On my -mm patched kernel I can see them.
Regards,
Martin
--
MyExcuse:
piezo-electric interference
Martin Zwickel <martin.zwickel@technotrend.de>
Research & Development
TechnoTrend AG <http://www.technotrend.de>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-05-25 7:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-05-25 2:21 Invisible threads in 2.6 lm240504
2004-05-25 7:03 ` Martin Zwickel [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-05-25 18:51 lm240504
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040525090302.66ac23bf@phoebee \
--to=martin.zwickel@technotrend.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lm240504@comcast.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.