From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino" Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 16:05:11 +0000 Subject: Re: [Kernel-janitors] [announce] kjt patch-set for 2.6.7-rc1 Message-Id: <20040526160511.GA1314@lorien.prodam> MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============66750692766502295==" List-Id: References: <20040524100025.GB1949@sputnik.stro.at> In-Reply-To: <20040524100025.GB1949@sputnik.stro.at> To: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org --===============66750692766502295== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Em Tue, May 25, 2004 at 07:42:06PM +0200, maximilian attems escreveu: | > | will try to release on weekly/10days base. | > | > Why not 5 days ? Are you too busy ? Maybe, we can have a | > maintainer per week (five utils days). | | hmm that would mean in 4 days from now, | sure i'm on university and should pass exams primarily.. I have the some problems... :-) | i may do that from time to time, but we don't produce that | many patches that it makes sense to me. Hummm, yes you right. Actually, there are times where we produce a lot of work... But is not always... | > I have a suggestion here. Why not apply the patch _even_ | > it does have a simple objection ? Of course, if a Mantainer | > says "don't", that's ok to drop. But if the patch is | > generating a discussion, it could be applyed. | > | > What do you think ? | | the primarily goal of kjt should be to collect patches | that are suitable for the official kj release from acme. Ok. | most objection on the kj mailing list are pretty funded. | but you are right that the rules for kjt shouldn't be too tight. Yes, its my suggestion... | > | +string_form_drivers | > | From: Luiz Fernando Capitulino | > | +keyboard_ptr_to_string | > | > I'm wondering about this patch, it is still alive ! | > | > It was my first patch in Janitors, does have about one year... | | /me laughs | yeeah, i know mine above is not much better, | they are still not merged, but we had that double check of size | by domen puncer, that was quite wired, he got bigger sizes by them. | (he used a red hat machine with gcc 3.3.3, if i remember correctly) | so i don't know if those should really be pushed. I don't remember the gcc version I used to test the patch, but will review it. -- Luiz Fernando N. Capitulino --===============66750692766502295== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Kernel-janitors mailing list Kernel-janitors@lists.osdl.org http://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors --===============66750692766502295==--