All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@suse.cz>
To: Larry McVoy <lm@work.bitmover.com>,
	bitkeeper-announce@work.bitmover.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: bk-3.2.0 released
Date: Sat, 29 May 2004 15:20:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040529132018.GA6221@ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040529130436.GA20605@work.bitmover.com>

On Sat, May 29, 2004 at 06:04:36AM -0700, Larry McVoy wrote:
> On Sat, May 29, 2004 at 11:54:20AM +0200, Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
> > On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 04:32:38PM -0700, Larry McVoy wrote:
> > > BitKeeper Users,
> > > 
> > > BK/Pro 3.2.0 has been released and is in the BK download area,
> > > 
> > >     http://bitmover.com/download
> > 
> > Any chance of a native x86-64 version? 
> 
> We don't have any x86-64 machines but we could get one.  I asked about this
> a while back and people told me that there was no point, the x86 one worked
> perfectly.  Can you tell me what having a native one would gain?  If there
> is any gain we'll do it.

Well, yes, of course, the x86 version works just fine, because x86-64 is
backward compatible.

The benefits won't be huge:

	a marginal speed increase due to more registers
	no need for 32-bit libs on the system and in memory
	enough address space for bk, should it ever need more
	a general feeling of doing things right ;)	

-- 
Vojtech Pavlik
SuSE Labs, SuSE CR

      parent reply	other threads:[~2004-05-29 13:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-05-18 23:32 bk-3.2.0 released Larry McVoy
2004-05-19  6:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-05-19 14:02   ` Larry McVoy
2004-05-19 14:11     ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2004-05-19 14:16       ` Larry McVoy
2004-05-19 14:23         ` Kevin P. Fleming
2004-05-19 14:36           ` John Bradford
2004-05-19 18:47             ` Tomas Szepe
2004-05-19 14:26         ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2004-05-19 14:48           ` Larry McVoy
2004-05-19 15:00             ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2004-05-19 15:09               ` Larry McVoy
2004-05-19 16:10                 ` Nicolas Pitre
2004-05-19 20:06           ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-05-19 21:20             ` Stan Bubrouski
2004-05-19 14:33         ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-05-19 14:32     ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-05-19 14:34     ` John Bradford
2004-05-19 15:41   ` Bill Davidsen
2004-05-20  3:10   ` Jeff Sipek
2004-05-29  9:54 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2004-05-29 13:04   ` Larry McVoy
2004-05-29 13:15     ` Hugo Mills
2004-05-29 13:20       ` Larry McVoy
2004-05-29 15:47       ` Larry McVoy
2004-05-29 20:13         ` Bryan O'Sullivan
2004-05-30  3:59         ` David Lang
2004-05-29 13:20     ` Vojtech Pavlik [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040529132018.GA6221@ucw.cz \
    --to=vojtech@suse.cz \
    --cc=bitkeeper-announce@work.bitmover.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lm@work.bitmover.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.