From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Zarochentsev Subject: Re: Working Reiser4 patch for kernel 2.6.6(-mm2)? Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 20:39:13 +0400 Message-ID: <20040602163913.GH8091@backtop.namesys.com> References: <200406021554.11690.rmeijer@internet.gr> <20040602125602.GC8091@backtop.namesys.com> <200406021603.46918.rmeijer@internet.gr> <20040602160234.GF8091@backtop.namesys.com> <20040602162348.GH4990@nysv.org> <20040602163444.GG8091@backtop.namesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040602163444.GG8091@backtop.namesys.com> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" To: Markus =?koi8-r?Q?T=F6rnqvist?= Cc: "Raymond A. Meijer" , reiserfs-list@namesys.com On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 08:34:45PM +0400, Alex Zarochentcev wrote: > On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 07:23:48PM +0300, Markus T=F6rnqvist wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 08:02:34PM +0400, Alex Zarochentsev wrote: > > >> But there was a kernel Oops and something like: > > >> "page_extent: trying to read past end of device. Want=3D23252123 Lim= it=3D83380" > > >It would be fine to see a (decoded) stack trace. >=20 > /Documentation/oops-tracing.txt=20 >=20 > > Not that I would have had this problem, but are there some general > > guidelines/FAQ-like answer on how to acquire this? > >=20 > > >> I can try again and write down the messages if you want... > > >Does the snapshot from 2004.04.21 or from 2004.03.26 work still ? > >=20 > > It's against 2.6.5, not 2.6.6, and I think that was the general idea... >=20 > Do you use RAID or LVM ? Sorry Markus, the last question is not for you. But why do you think 2.6.6 is the point?=20 > --=20 > Alex. --=20 Alex.