From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: mjt@nysv.org Markus =?unknown-8bit?q?T=F6rnqvist?= Subject: Re: Working Reiser4 patch for kernel 2.6.6(-mm2)? Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 19:52:08 +0300 Message-ID: <20040602165208.GI4990@nysv.org> References: <200406021554.11690.rmeijer@internet.gr> <20040602125602.GC8091@backtop.namesys.com> <200406021603.46918.rmeijer@internet.gr> <20040602160234.GF8091@backtop.namesys.com> <20040602162348.GH4990@nysv.org> <20040602163444.GG8091@backtop.namesys.com> <20040602163913.GH8091@backtop.namesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040602163913.GH8091@backtop.namesys.com> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Alex Zarochentsev Cc: "Raymond A. Meijer" , reiserfs-list@namesys.com On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 08:39:13PM +0400, Alex Zarochentsev wrote: >Sorry Markus, the last question is not for you. But why do you think >2.6.6 is the point? This is from the original mail: Can someone point me to a WORKING Reiser4 patch for kernel 2.6.6 or 2.6.6-mm2? And: Subject: Re: Working Reiser4 patch for kernel 2.6.6(-mm2)? ;) Besides that, maybe some other bugfix that's not easily included or just the desire to ride the bleeding edge... -- mjt