From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.33) id 1BVq2D-000312-A3 for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jun 2004 07:05:21 -0400 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BVq2B-00030s-VE for grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jun 2004 07:05:20 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BVq28-00030g-0Q for grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jun 2004 07:05:19 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BVq27-00030d-Ud for grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jun 2004 07:05:15 -0400 Received: from [212.43.237.68] (helo=kotoba.storever.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BVq1a-0001rf-2I for grub-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Jun 2004 07:04:42 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by kotoba.storever.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7405B15F526EF for ; Thu, 3 Jun 2004 07:04:39 -0400 (EDT) From: "Yoshinori K. Okuji" Organization: enbug.org To: The development of GRUB 2 Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2004 13:08:25 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.3 References: <20040601121704.GA4680@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <1086176188.40bdbbbc4d86d@webmail.han.nl> <20040602144303.GA2376@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> In-Reply-To: <20040602144303.GA2376@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200406031308.26011.okuji@enbug.org> Subject: Re: normal vs. rescue mode commands X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list Reply-To: The development of GRUB 2 List-Id: The development of GRUB 2 List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2004 11:05:20 -0000 On Wednesday 02 June 2004 16:43, Tomas Ebenlendr wrote: > And what about enabling rescue mode commands in normal mode? I don't think it would be very useful. Even the command 'unset' will be implemented in a different way, say, to support set/unset hooks for special variables. > If it is not good idea, what about command 'rescuecmd' which will > execute one command of rescue mode? Why do you want this? Okuji