All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
Cc: mikpe@csd.uu.se, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, rusty@rustcorp.com.au,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org, ak@muc.de,
	ashok.raj@intel.com, hch@infradead.org, jbarnes@sgi.com,
	joe.korty@ccur.com, manfred@colorfullife.com,
	colpatch@us.ibm.com, Simon.Derr@bull.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpumask 5/10 rewrite cpumask.h - single bitmap based implementation
Date: Fri, 4 Jun 2004 10:52:55 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040604175255.GD21007@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040604102946.1d501953.pj@sgi.com>

On Fri, Jun 04, 2004 at 10:29:46AM -0700, Paul Jackson wrote:
> I'd vote to have the documented form that Andrew speaks of be arrays
> of 32-bit words, which is what I understood Mikael was doing.  I agree
> with Andrew's suggested to/from canonical functions.
> I'd prefer not copying arrays of unsigned longs, due to the confusions
> of coding to them across 32/64 bit and big/little endian architectures.
> At times I have wished the kernel had chosen u32 arrays instead of
> unsigned long arrays for bitmaps, for the same reason.  The cpumask
> sprintf and parse format is intentionally 32-bit chunk friendly.

Index: irqaction-2.6.7-rc2/include/linux/bitmap.h
===================================================================
--- irqaction-2.6.7-rc2.orig/include/linux/bitmap.h	2004-05-29 23:26:49.000000000 -0700
+++ irqaction-2.6.7-rc2/include/linux/bitmap.h	2004-06-04 10:35:31.982041000 -0700
@@ -46,6 +46,7 @@
 			const unsigned long *maskp, int bits);
 int bitmap_parse(const char __user *ubuf, unsigned int ubuflen,
 			unsigned long *maskp, int bits);
+void bitmap_to_u32_array(u32 *dst, unsigned long *src, int nlongs);
 
 #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
 
Index: irqaction-2.6.7-rc2/lib/bitmap.c
===================================================================
--- irqaction-2.6.7-rc2.orig/lib/bitmap.c	2004-05-29 23:26:27.000000000 -0700
+++ irqaction-2.6.7-rc2/lib/bitmap.c	2004-06-04 10:51:46.878834000 -0700
@@ -330,3 +330,22 @@
 	return 0;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(bitmap_parse);
+
+#if defined(__BIG_ENDIAN) && BITS_PER_LONG == 64
+void bitmap_to_u32_array(u32 *dst, unsigned long *src, int nwords)
+{
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < nwords; ++i) {
+		u64 word = src[i];
+		dst[2*i] = word >> 32;
+		dst[2*i+1] = word;
+	}
+}
+#else
+void bitmap_to_u32_array(u32 *dst, unsigned long *src, int nwords)
+{
+	memcpy(dst, src, nwords*sizeof(unsigned long));
+}
+#endif
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(bitmap_to_u32_array);

  reply	other threads:[~2004-06-04 17:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 92+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-06-03 16:43 [PATCH] Bitmap and Cpumask Cleanup - Overview Paul Jackson
2004-06-03 17:05 ` [PATCH] cpumask 1/10 cpu_present_map real even on non-smp Paul Jackson
2004-06-03 17:09 ` [PATCH] cpumask 2/10 bitmap cleanup preparation for cpumask overhaul Paul Jackson
2004-06-03 17:09 ` [PATCH] cpumask 3/10 bitmap inlining and optimizations Paul Jackson
2004-06-03 17:09 ` [PATCH] cpumask 4/10 uninline find_next_bit on ia64 Paul Jackson
2004-06-03 17:10 ` [PATCH] cpumask 5/10 rewrite cpumask.h - single bitmap based implementation Paul Jackson
2004-06-04  0:07   ` Andrew Morton
2004-06-04  0:25     ` Andrew Morton
2004-06-04  2:58       ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-04  2:47     ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-04  2:54       ` David S. Miller
2004-06-04  5:02         ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-04  5:01           ` David S. Miller
2004-06-04  1:47   ` Rusty Russell
2004-06-04  2:02     ` Nick Piggin
2004-06-04  2:19       ` Rusty Russell
2004-06-04  5:18       ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-04  5:22         ` David S. Miller
2004-06-04  6:57           ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-04  9:31         ` Mikael Pettersson
2004-06-04  9:37           ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-04  9:46             ` Mikael Pettersson
2004-06-04  9:59               ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-04 11:16                 ` Mikael Pettersson
2004-06-04 11:27                   ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-04 11:32                     ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-04 16:23                       ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-04 16:28                         ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-04 17:47                           ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-04 18:12                             ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-04 18:20                               ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-04 18:27                               ` Andrew Morton
2004-06-04 18:38                                 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-05  2:51                                   ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-05  3:29                                     ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-04 18:42                               ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-04 18:42                                 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-05  6:48                                   ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-06  2:07                               ` Rusty Russell
2004-06-06 12:16                                 ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-06 12:13                                   ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-06 12:28                                     ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-06 12:36                                       ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-06 13:42                                         ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-06 23:20                                   ` Rusty Russell
2004-06-07  6:44                                     ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-04  9:41           ` Andrew Morton
2004-06-05  7:01             ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-04 16:03           ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-04 16:56             ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-04 17:29               ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-04 17:52                 ` William Lee Irwin III [this message]
2004-06-04 19:01                   ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-04 19:08               ` Anton Blanchard
2004-06-04 19:17                 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-04 20:28                 ` Andrew Morton
2004-06-07  7:55                   ` Anton Blanchard
2004-06-05  7:28                 ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-06  8:07                   ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-06  8:16                     ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-05  0:05               ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-05  1:31                 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-05  8:04                   ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-05  8:26                     ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-06  8:40                       ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-06 12:34                         ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-07 16:54                       ` fix up compat_sched_[get/set]affinity Joe Korty
2004-06-07 17:07                         ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-04  5:30       ` [PATCH] cpumask 5/10 rewrite cpumask.h - single bitmap based implementation Paul Jackson
2004-06-04  5:35         ` Nick Piggin
2004-06-04  5:40           ` Andrew Morton
2004-06-04  5:53             ` Nick Piggin
2004-06-04  6:47             ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-04  4:31     ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-04  8:19   ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-04  8:43     ` Keith Owens
2004-06-04  9:54       ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-04 17:08         ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-09 16:38         ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-04  9:14     ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-03 17:10 ` [PATCH] cpumask 6/10 remove 26 no longer used cpumask*.h files Paul Jackson
2004-06-03 17:10 ` [PATCH] cpumask 7/10 remove obsolete cpumask macro uses - i386 arch Paul Jackson
2004-06-03 17:10 ` [PATCH] cpumask 8/10 remove obsolete cpumask macro uses - other archs Paul Jackson
2004-06-03 17:11 ` [PATCH] cpumask 9/10 Remove no longer used obsolete macro emulation Paul Jackson
2004-06-03 17:11 ` [PATCH] cpumask 10/10 optimize various uses of new cpumasks Paul Jackson
2004-06-04  4:27   ` Rusty Russell
2004-06-04  4:40     ` Nick Piggin
2004-06-04  4:51     ` Paul Jackson
2004-06-09  0:09   ` PATCH] cpumask 11/10 comment, spacing tweaks Paul Jackson
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-06-06 15:07 [PATCH] cpumask 5/10 rewrite cpumask.h - single bitmap based implementation Mikael Pettersson
2004-06-06 16:44 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-06-06 17:46   ` Paul Jackson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040604175255.GD21007@holomorphy.com \
    --to=wli@holomorphy.com \
    --cc=Simon.Derr@bull.net \
    --cc=ak@muc.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=colpatch@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jbarnes@sgi.com \
    --cc=joe.korty@ccur.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=manfred@colorfullife.com \
    --cc=mikpe@csd.uu.se \
    --cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --cc=pj@sgi.com \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.