Re: nfsd, rmtab, failover, and stale filehandles

["J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>]

On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 01:05:59PM +1000, Neil Brown wrote:
> > I'm looking at exportfs.c to see if I can add in a call to flush the caching
> > when unmounting, does the following seem reasonable?
> 
> The code already flushes the caches if anything has changed.
> 
> Towards the end of main() in exportfs.c there is:
> 
> 	xtab_export_write();
> 	if (new_cache)
> 		cache_flush(force_flush);

Ah!  I missed that.

> And to answer Bruce's subsequent question:
> > Can someone explaing what the reason was for adding the -f flag to
> > exportfs?
> Because it is useful for testing.  It should not be needed during
> normal running.

Got it, that makes more sense.  But if the only time "-f" is ever needed
is when there's a bug somewhere, then maybe it should just be removed,
or at least not documented?  Otherwise it seems like it's only likely to
cause confusion.

--b.


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: GNOME Foundation
Hackers Unite!  GUADEC: The world's #1 Open Source Desktop Event.
GNOME Users and Developers European Conference, 28-30th June in Norway
http://2004/guadec.org
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist  -  NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs