From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jason Boxman <jasonb@edseek.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2004 21:06:20 +0000
Subject: Re: [LARTC] Re: how flexible is ingress traffic policing to bandwidth limit?
Message-Id: <200406091706.20215.jasonb@edseek.com>
List-Id: <lartc.vger.kernel.org>
References: <87wu2hwp8e.fsf@stark.xeocode.com>
In-Reply-To: <87wu2hwp8e.fsf@stark.xeocode.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org

On Wednesday 09 June 2004 16:09, Greg Stark wrote:
> Sanjay Arora <skpobox@gawab.com> writes:
> > Sorry to interrupt the flow, especially being a newbie, but won=C2=B4t =
the
> > sender just retransmit the dropped packets at the same rate?
>
> no.
>
> > I am not so thorogh with TCP/IP, but is there something in the protocol
> > that speeds or slows the transmission.
>
> yes.
>
> > Please do explain in the TCP/IP for complete idiots terminology ;-))
>
> You could do worse than this:
>
> http://www.thinkingsecure.com/docs/TCPIP-Illustrated-1/tcp_time.htm#21_0

I have to admit, I am thus far thoroughly enjoying:

Jacobson, V., Congestion Avoidance and Control. Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM =

'88. August 1988, p. 314-329.

It's also available in Postscript format:

ftp://ftp.ee.lbl.gov/papers/congavoid.ps.Z

For those who don't know how TCP handles congestion, this is a rather=20
excellent read.


_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/