From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pierre Etchemaite Subject: Re: snapshot, checkpoints Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 06:54:27 +0200 Message-ID: <20040610065427.622450fb@rayanne> References: <20040527065259.99429.qmail@web51306.mail.yahoo.com> <1085641393.1915.199.camel@tribesman.namesys.com> <20040527092727.GO4990@nysv.org> <20040604131005.hmvps8wcw4sccgcs@www.wagland.net> <200406041925.i54JPZgp025255@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <40C14E9C.4000706@slaphack.com> <116CD3CA-B709-11D8-A933-000A95CD704C@kungfoocoder.org> <40C78D86.2060305@slaphack.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <40C78D86.2060305@slaphack.com> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" To: reiserfs-list@namesys.com Le Wed, 09 Jun 2004 17:21:58 -0500, David Masover a =E9crit : > Good, then we don't have to immediately rewrite the wheel. But I still > would rather that we do this eventually. My concept has the changes > stored on the same partition, seems like it may be faster, and opens the > door for a filesystem-based cvs. Look for "copy-on-write links" (cow links for short) in archives, or with Google; You'll find many hits, including a message from 2000 suggesting the idea has been around since at least 1997...