From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: KOVACS Krisztian Subject: Re: Traffic accounting over ULOG inefficient? Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 21:27:17 +0200 Sender: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <20040610192717.GA29599@sch.bme.hu> References: <200406102005.20214.arny@ats.s.bawue.de> <200406102112.02640.arny@ats.s.bawue.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200406102112.02640.arny@ats.s.bawue.de> Errors-To: netfilter-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Thilo Schulz Cc: netfilter@lists.netfilter.org Hi, On Thu, Jun 10, 2004 at 09:11:48PM +0200, Thilo Schulz wrote: > On Thursday 10 June 2004 20:25, Chris Green wrote: > > There is a patch in patch-o-matic for ctnetlink that implements a > > different type of interface to get these counters from connection > > tracking but I can't seem to find out any information on it aside > > from questions about it go unanswered. > > Actually, I'm not so much interested in connection checking. What I need is a > counter, that tells me how much data is going through a rule, without giving > me the content of the packet itself. Maybe this tiny module is what you're looking for? (Although I've never used it myself, it looks to me a viable approach to traffic accounting.) http://www.intra2net.com/opensource/ipt_account/ -- KOVACS Krisztian