All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: mjt@nysv.org
To: Henning Westerholt <henning-04@die.informatik.uni-siegen.de>
Cc: reiserfs-list@namesys.com
Subject: Re: Problem with the latest auto snapshot
Date: Sun, 13 Jun 2004 16:43:44 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040613134344.GK4990@nysv.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200406131537.54853.henning-04@die.informatik.uni-siegen.de>

On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 03:37:54PM +0200, Henning Westerholt wrote:
>i'm using the same reiser4 config like you.

Weirdness.

>I just rebuild the partition, and start a small compile job. After them i 
>started a fsck. It reported a new fatal error about a broken node. I attached 
>the output from fsck. I could reproduce this error two times. 

The only question that I can think of is this.
Did you umount the partition?

There is supposedly a bug in current reiser4progs concerning mountpoints,
so it doesn't refuse to fsck a mounted partition.

That is bad.

>Error: On-disk used blocks and really used blocks differ.
>Free block count 2354038 found in the format is wrong. Sould be 2441757.

Could this be because the partition is in use?
If it's trafficking data all the time and fsck can't catch up?

I vaguely remember an ancient discussion with Nik Danilov about having
online fsck and he said something about the kernel/fs never being
able to trust userspace data about disk usage or something...

>I could reproduce this error too. If i remember it correctly, i have had this 
>problem with the 03.26 snapshot before.
>
>I start now a kde-3.2.3 compile run, lets see if the new code survive this..

Does it still stall?

Are the only real corruptions visible at fsck time?

-- 
mjt


  reply	other threads:[~2004-06-13 13:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-06-12 19:31 Problem with the latest auto snapshot Henning Westerholt
2004-06-12 19:46 ` mjt
2004-06-13 13:37   ` Henning Westerholt
2004-06-13 13:43     ` mjt [this message]
2004-06-14  9:13       ` Henning Westerholt
2004-06-14  9:21         ` mjt
2004-06-14 18:08         ` Hans Reiser
2004-06-15  8:06     ` Alex Zarochentsev
2004-06-15  8:14       ` Alex Zarochentsev
2004-06-15 16:50         ` Henning Westerholt
2004-06-15 17:44           ` Alex Zarochentsev
2004-06-15 18:19             ` Henning Westerholt
2004-06-14 18:22 ` Alex Zarochentsev
2004-06-14 22:55   ` Henning Westerholt
2004-06-15  4:34     ` Alex Zarochentsev

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040613134344.GK4990@nysv.org \
    --to=mjt@nysv.org \
    --cc=henning-04@die.informatik.uni-siegen.de \
    --cc=reiserfs-list@namesys.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.