From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
To: Tom Rini <trini@kernel.crashing.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
Wolfgang Denk <wd@denx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] kbuild
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2004 21:14:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040615191418.GD2310@mars.ravnborg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040615190951.C7666@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 07:09:51PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> >
> > Compared to the original behaviour where the all: target picked the default
> > target for a given architecture, this patch adds the following:
>
> This isn't the case on ARM. I've always told people 'make zImage'
> or 'make Image'. I've never told people to use just 'make' on its
> own - in fact, I've never used 'make' on its own with the kernel.
Why not?
Letting the build system select a default target is often a
better choice than some random choice by a developer.
>
> > - One has to select the default kernel image only once
> > when configuring the kernel.
> > - There exist a possibility to add more than half a line of text
> > describing individual targets. All relevant information can be
> > specified in the help section in the Kconfig file
>
> You can't fit details for 500 platforms into half a line of text.
Not discussing different platforms, only discussing kernel targets.
For arm I see the following:
zImage, Image bootpImage uImage
And some test targets: zImg, Img, bp, i, zi
Not counting the test targets it is only 4 target of which 3 is
documented in help today.
>
> > If we remove the current support for for example uboot we create an
> > additional step in between the make and copy image.
>
> uboot support on ARM was only recently added, and only happened
> because I happened to misread the patch. Had I been more on the
> ball, the support would NOT have been merged. However, as it did
> get merged, I didn't want to create extra noise by taking it out.
>
> Please don't take this as acceptance that throwing the uboot crap
> into the kernel for ARM was something I found agreeable. I still
> find it distasteful that boot loaders have to define their own
> image formats and the kernel has to conform to the boot loader
> authors whims.
Maybe Wolgang can jump in here - I do not know why mkimage is needed.
But I do like to have it present for convinience.
It is btw called mkuboot.sh in scripts/ to better say what it does.
Sam
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-06-15 19:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-06-14 20:40 [PATCH 0/5] kbuild Sam Ravnborg
2004-06-14 20:44 ` [PATCH 1/5] kbuild: default kernel image Sam Ravnborg
2004-06-14 21:05 ` Russell King
2004-06-15 4:40 ` Sam Ravnborg
2004-06-15 8:38 ` Russell King
2004-06-15 8:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-06-15 21:07 ` Sam Ravnborg
2004-06-15 21:17 ` Russell King
2004-06-16 15:34 ` Tom Rini
2004-06-15 15:38 ` Tom Rini
2004-06-15 15:53 ` Russell King
2004-06-14 20:45 ` [PATCH 2/5] kbuild: move rpm to scripts/package Sam Ravnborg
2004-06-14 20:46 ` [PATCH 3/5] kbuild: add deb-pkg target Sam Ravnborg
2004-06-14 20:58 ` Wichert Akkerman
2004-06-14 21:22 ` Sam Ravnborg
2004-06-14 20:46 ` [PATCH 4/5] kbuild: make clean improved Sam Ravnborg
2004-06-14 20:50 ` Russell King
2004-06-14 21:19 ` Sam Ravnborg
2004-06-14 21:38 ` Tom Rini
2004-06-15 4:36 ` Sam Ravnborg
2004-06-15 18:50 ` V13
2004-06-14 20:48 ` [PATCH 5/5] kbuild: external module build doc Sam Ravnborg
2004-06-15 12:13 ` Horst von Brand
2004-06-15 20:09 ` Sam Ravnborg
2004-06-15 19:21 ` Jari Ruusu
2004-06-15 19:55 ` Sam Ravnborg
2004-06-15 23:00 ` Martin Schlemmer
2004-06-16 17:32 ` Jari Ruusu
2004-06-14 20:59 ` [PATCH 0/5] kbuild Sam Ravnborg
2004-06-14 23:56 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-06-15 15:41 ` Tom Rini
2004-06-15 17:49 ` Sam Ravnborg
2004-06-15 17:54 ` Tom Rini
2004-06-15 19:01 ` Sam Ravnborg
2004-06-15 19:27 ` Tom Rini
2004-06-15 21:02 ` Sam Ravnborg
2004-06-15 21:24 ` Tom Rini
2004-06-15 18:09 ` Russell King
2004-06-15 19:14 ` Sam Ravnborg [this message]
2004-06-15 19:46 ` Russell King
2004-06-15 20:12 ` Sam Ravnborg
2004-06-15 20:55 ` Sam Ravnborg
2004-06-15 20:59 ` Tom Rini
2004-06-15 21:24 ` Sam Ravnborg
2004-06-15 21:06 ` Russell King
2004-06-16 19:49 ` Sam Ravnborg
2004-06-16 20:08 ` Tom Rini
2004-06-16 20:54 ` Sam Ravnborg
2004-06-16 20:49 ` Tom Rini
2004-06-17 6:56 ` Jan-Benedict Glaw
2004-06-18 20:58 ` Sam Ravnborg
[not found] <sam@ravnborg.org>
2004-09-05 20:12 ` kbuild: Simplify vmlinux generation Sam Ravnborg
2004-09-05 20:19 ` Sam Ravnborg
2004-09-06 18:41 ` Horst von Brand
2004-09-06 19:00 ` Sam Ravnborg
2004-09-06 19:12 ` Sam Ravnborg
2014-06-11 19:25 ` [PATCH v2] x86,vdso: Fix vdso_install Andy Lutomirski
2014-06-11 19:45 ` Sam Ravnborg
2014-06-12 13:19 ` Josh Boyer
2014-06-12 15:28 ` [PATCH v3] " Andy Lutomirski
2014-06-12 15:28 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-06-12 17:01 ` Josh Boyer
2014-06-13 17:24 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-06-13 17:28 ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-06-13 18:19 ` [tip:x86/vdso] x86/vdso: " tip-bot for Andy Lutomirski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040615191418.GD2310@mars.ravnborg.org \
--to=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=trini@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=wd@denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.