From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Thu, 17 Jun 2004 13:31:36 +0100 (BST)
Received: from p508B769B.dip.t-dialin.net ([IPv6:::ffff:80.139.118.155]:49709
	"EHLO mail.linux-mips.net") by linux-mips.org with ESMTP
	id <S8225393AbUFQMbd>; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 13:31:33 +0100
Received: from fluff.linux-mips.net (fluff.linux-mips.net [127.0.0.1])
	by mail.linux-mips.net (8.12.11/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i5HCVQmk018649;
	Thu, 17 Jun 2004 14:31:27 +0200
Received: (from ralf@localhost)
	by fluff.linux-mips.net (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i5HCVQkn018648;
	Thu, 17 Jun 2004 14:31:26 +0200
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 14:31:26 +0200
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
To: Stanislaw Skowronek <sskowron@ET.PUT.Poznan.PL>
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: Re: CONFIG_MDULES patch
Message-ID: <20040617123126.GA18274@linux-mips.org>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10405151618380.26862-200000@helios.et.put.poznan.pl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10405151618380.26862-200000@helios.et.put.poznan.pl>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
Return-Path: <ralf@linux-mips.org>
X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0)
X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
X-archive-position: 5323
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
X-original-sender: ralf@linux-mips.org
Precedence: bulk
X-list: linux-mips

On Sat, May 15, 2004 at 04:19:43PM +0200, Stanislaw Skowronek wrote:

> This is a patch for the (insignificant) bug I found some time ago and
> posted this morning.

The higher powers didn't like your patch.  Last night I've checked in a
patch for this problem which has already been approved from upstream.
Let me know if this works for you.

  Ralf