All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Davis <paul@linuxaudiosystems.com>
To: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
Cc: Alsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, pzad@pobox.sk
Subject: Re: emu10k1 latency / capture period
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 19:26:46 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200406172326.i5HNQkQV017899@dhin.linuxaudiosystems.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 17 Jun 2004 14:37:27 EDT." <40D1E4E7.8000704@joe-job.com>

>To reiterate the situation:  currently the ASIO drivers for this card 
>provide an order of magnitude
>better latency than the ALSA driver.  I am constantly hearing claims 
>that ALSA is superior to ASIO,
>but no one can tell me why the ALSA drivers for this *very* common 
>device provide 5-10x worse latency
>than the ASIO drivers.
>
>As I see it, this is a glaring deficiency.

as a disinterested observer, i would just note that by my
understanding, Creative have not released all the necessary
programming information on the emu10k1. i suspect that whatever is
necessary to get the period size down to the levels the ASIO driver(s)
are using is in the information that they will not release without an
NDA. 

"freedom! my freedom! you got to give for what you take!"

--p


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by The 2004 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Learn from the experts at JavaOne(SM), Sun's Worldwide Java Developer
Conference, June 28 - July 1 at the Moscone Center in San Francisco, CA
REGISTER AND SAVE! http://java.sun.com/javaone/sf Priority Code NWMGYKND

  reply	other threads:[~2004-06-17 23:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-06-17  9:06 emu10k1 latency / capture period Peter Zubaj
2004-06-17 18:37 ` Lee Revell
2004-06-17 23:26   ` Paul Davis [this message]
2004-06-18  9:33     ` Takashi Iwai
2004-06-18 19:39       ` Lee Revell
2004-06-18 23:26       ` Lee Revell
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-06-21  8:03 Peter Zubaj
2004-06-21 15:26 ` Takashi Iwai
2004-06-21 20:27   ` Lee Revell
2004-06-16 20:14 Lee Revell
2004-06-16 20:52 ` James Courtier-Dutton
2004-06-16 21:02   ` Lee Revell
2004-06-20  4:06 ` Lee Revell
2004-06-21 15:35   ` Takashi Iwai
2004-06-21 15:54     ` Takashi Iwai
2004-06-21 20:20       ` Lee Revell
2004-06-22 11:13         ` Takashi Iwai
2004-06-22 11:29           ` Jaroslav Kysela
2004-06-22 12:47             ` Takashi Iwai
2004-06-22 21:15               ` Lee Revell
2004-06-28 20:44               ` Lee Revell
2004-06-22 20:26             ` Lee Revell
2004-06-22 18:48           ` Lee Revell
2004-06-21 20:25     ` Lee Revell
2004-07-08  0:40     ` Lee Revell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200406172326.i5HNQkQV017899@dhin.linuxaudiosystems.com \
    --to=paul@linuxaudiosystems.com \
    --cc=Alsa-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=pzad@pobox.sk \
    --cc=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.