From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vitaly Fertman Subject: Re: fsck 0.5.5 time Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 16:20:25 +0400 Message-ID: <200406181620.25609.vitaly@namesys.com> References: <20040618110112.GG4990@nysv.org> <40D2D82B.3090301@namesys.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com In-Reply-To: <40D2D82B.3090301@namesys.com> Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" To: "Vladimir V. Saveliev" , Markus =?utf-8?q?T=C3=B6rnqvist?= Cc: reiserfs-list@namesys.com Hello, On Friday 18 June 2004 15:55, Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote: > Hello > > Markus T=F6rnqvist wrote: > > Hi > > > > How long is the expected time for fsck to run? depends on the speed of your hardware, kind of corruptions,=20 fsck options, many things. > It may take several hours. Especially, because, I guess, there was not > much work done in its performance > > > I did --fix on my root partition, which is around 32 gigabytes and it > > took nearly an hour, maybe. The fact that I cancelled --build-sb to run > > --fix sort of messed up my measurements. > > > > However, my /home/mjt/ is 102G with about 50 free. > > > > Time interval: Fri Jun 18 12:41:09 2004 - Fri Jun 18 12:41:14 2004 > > > > That's about the only time reference I have. The time is now about 14:0= 0. > > > > How should it take? > > The thing is, I'm leaving with my desktop computer in a few hours, so I > > may have to cancel and restart later. I also don't want to re-do this, = as > > I'll be busy until Sunday with more pressing matters. > > Can you just leave it to work? When you will be back - everything will > be done > > > Are there any risks in using the read-only mounted /home/ while fscking? > > If it mounts - you can probably use it. Just do not be surprised with > EIO, ENOENT, etc > > > Are there any risks in using the /home/ read-write without the stat data > > extensions, or whatever --fix fixes? should be ok, if you are talking about the plugin set that is added into=20 the root.=20 > > Is there some more verbosity coming into fsck, just to let me know it's > > actually doing something? Sure, I follow it with top -d1 but that's > > not too reassuring. Maybe some counter of how many {kilo,mega,giga}bytes > > left to check or some tree numbers or _anything_. yes, you are right, there will be some progress on semtanic pass also,=20 it has not been implemented yet.=20 > How do you run fsck.reiser4? > > > Thanks a million! --=20 Thanks, Vitaly Fertman