From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Phil Oester Subject: Re: Deadlocks Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 10:12:14 -0700 Sender: netfilter-devel-admin@lists.netfilter.org Message-ID: <20040618171214.GA750@linuxace.com> References: <20040609180909.GA11445@linuxace.com> <1087156709.11287.8.camel@ws> <20040615044723.GA16891@linuxace.com> <40CE95DE.9090703@trash.net> <20040617155946.GA28564@linuxace.com> <40D1C4BF.8070605@trash.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org Return-path: To: Patrick McHardy Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40D1C4BF.8070605@trash.net> Errors-To: netfilter-devel-admin@lists.netfilter.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Id: netfilter-devel.vger.kernel.org Well, it lasted about 36 hours -- not much longer than usual. Unfortunately, the stack appears to have been corrupted, so I can't get a decent backtrace. Here is what I could get off of SysRQ-P: Pid: 0, comm: swapper EIP: 0060:[] CPU: 1 EIP is at tcp_find_option+0x55/0xa0 EFLAGS: 00000203 Not tainted (2.6.7) EAX: 000000fe EBX: 00000040 ECX: 00000002 EDX: 00000034 ESI: 00000018 EDI: f89c39bc EBP: 00000000 DS: 007b ES: 007b CR0: 8005003b CR2: 080da0b4 CR3: 379cc000 CR4: 000006d0 Stack pointer is garbage, not printing trace Perhaps of interest, not sure, but the FTP server at 10.0.16.197 frequently shows duplicate expectations, as shown below shortly after rebooting: EXPECTING: - use=1 proto=6 src=10.0.16.197 dst=10.0.53.248 sport=0 dport=4353 EXPECTING: - use=1 proto=6 src=10.0.16.197 dst=10.0.53.248 sport=0 dport=4353 EXPECTING: - use=1 proto=6 src=10.0.16.197 dst=10.0.53.248 sport=0 dport=4353 Unless you've got any other ideas, may have to revert this box to non-SMP so I can have a peaceful weekend ;-) Phil On Thu, Jun 17, 2004 at 06:20:15PM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote: > Phil Oester wrote: > >In any event, I have applied your patch to 2.6.7, and am running it. > >Typically > >the box would not last more than a couple days, so I'll let you know what > >happens. > > Great, I'm really interested ..