From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@engr.sgi.com>
Cc: bcasavan@sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rusty@rustcorp.com.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add kallsyms_lookup() result cache
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2004 01:56:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040619015652.232b3b55.ak@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200406181926.39294.jbarnes@engr.sgi.com>
On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 19:26:39 -0400
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@engr.sgi.com> wrote:
> On Friday, June 18, 2004 6:03 pm, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > On Fri, 18 Jun 2004 15:03:00 -0500
> >
> > Brent Casavant <bcasavan@sgi.com> wrote:
> > > On 2.6 based systems, the top command utilizes /proc/[pid]/wchan to
> > > determine WCHAN symbol name information. This information is provided
> > > by the kernel function kallsyms_lookup(), which expands a stem-compressed
> >
> > That sounds more like a bug in your top to me. /proc/*/wchan itself
> > does not access kallsyms, it just outputs a number.undisclosed-recipients:;
>
> No, it outputs a string:
> jbarnes@mill:~$ cat /proc/1/wchan
> do_select
Indeed. I looked at /proc/self/wchan, but of course that is 0 because
the process is running.
But there is numerical wchan anyways - just get it from /proc/*/stat
That is what all 2.4 based tops always used. I bet they still
have the fallback code for that around.The 2.6 change
will just be to read the symbol table from /proc/kallsyms instead
of from the System.map file.
>
> > Doing the cache in the kernel is the wrong place. This should be fixed
> > in user space.
>
> Sure, but that would be a change in behavior. It's arguably the right thing
> to do though.
Change what behaviour? I argue that doing it in the kernel is the wrong
thing.
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-06-18 23:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-06-18 20:03 [PATCH] Add kallsyms_lookup() result cache Brent Casavant
2004-06-18 20:37 ` Martin Josefsson
2004-06-18 20:55 ` Brent Casavant
2004-06-18 22:03 ` Andi Kleen
2004-06-18 23:26 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-06-18 23:56 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2004-06-19 0:16 ` Jesse Barnes
2004-06-18 23:31 ` Brent Casavant
2004-06-18 23:59 ` Andi Kleen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-06-19 0:43 Albert Cahalan
2004-06-19 4:51 ` Herbert Xu
2004-06-19 12:03 ` Albert Cahalan
2004-06-19 10:06 ` Andrew Morton
2004-06-19 13:05 ` Albert Cahalan
2004-06-22 19:45 ` Brent Casavant
2004-06-22 20:10 ` Jesse Barnes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040619015652.232b3b55.ak@suse.de \
--to=ak@suse.de \
--cc=bcasavan@sgi.com \
--cc=jbarnes@engr.sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.