From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Zarochentsev Subject: Re: Reiser4's status of this week. Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 16:24:59 +0400 Message-ID: <20040620122458.GC5084@backtop.namesys.com> References: <7794555.1087651158684.JavaMail.postfix@mx20.mail.sohu.com> <40D45B6C.7000002@namesys.com> <40D482CB.1080303@netscape.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: list-help: list-unsubscribe: list-post: Errors-To: flx@namesys.com Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40D482CB.1080303@netscape.net> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "Nicholas S. Wourms" Cc: reiserfs-list@namesys.com On Sat, Jun 19, 2004 at 02:15:39PM -0400, Nicholas S. Wourms wrote: > Hans Reiser wrote: > >stone_wang@sohu.com wrote: > > > >>Hi,Hans: > >> > >>Your website are saying "Reiser4 is in final testing, and will ship > >>soon!" It has been saying that for a long time :( > >> > >> > >>When could Reiser4 be finaly released? We are eager to try it. > >> > >>Regards. > >> > >>Stone. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >next week. or so we hope. > > Hans, > > I've noticed that there seems to be a problem with your > reiser4-linux-2.6 bitkeeper repository. Unlike the 2.5 version I used > awhile back, this one seems to just be an old copy of the stock > linux-2.6.5 kernel with the 2.6.5-mm2 patches added. None of the > reiser4 base or extra patches seem to have been added (excluding the > ones for fs/reiser4). Would someone mind fixing this? Don't you have > an internal repository with all the modifications in the base and extra > series applied? Yes we have. We work with an internal bk repository. The public repositories are copies of the internal ones, we have a script to update public repositories once per day. We will figure out after weekend why it does not after weekend. > If your internal tree can't be exported, can you > provide a snapshot BK-style(not gnu) patch against linus-current? we have two repositories, one for core kernel + our local changes to the core, reiser4 itself is in another BK. I think we can't provide one bk-style patch easily. > I've also noticed, as has been noted in the past, that bk pulls are > still broken. Someone mentioned that it is a problem with the new bk. > If this is true, why not contact Larry for support? Flx did, but the problem still there. > Not that it matters now, since the reiser4-linux-2.6 isn't usable, but it > might be helpful for future syncs. > Cheers, Nicholas -- Alex.