From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Werner Almesberger Subject: Re: elevator priorities vs. full request queues Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 13:57:59 -0300 Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20040623135759.M1325@almesberger.net> References: <20040622012502.B1325@almesberger.net> <20040622074852.GW12881@suse.de> <20040622052644.D1325@almesberger.net> <20040622101434.GB12881@suse.de> <20040622160859.I1325@almesberger.net> <20040623101430.GI1120@suse.de> <20040623094632.L1325@almesberger.net> <20040623164659.GN1120@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from almesberger.net ([63.105.73.238]:51728 "EHLO host.almesberger.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S266574AbUFWQ6L (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Jun 2004 12:58:11 -0400 To: Jens Axboe Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040623164659.GN1120@suse.de>; from axboe@suse.de on Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 06:46:59PM +0200 List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org Jens Axboe wrote: > Not sure I quite understand what you mean here, pass the bio in where? To elv_may_queue (and its callers), just like your patch passes "prio". So the call to bio_prio would move into *_may_queue. (And maybe we'd have to allow NULL, for requests fabricated in a special way.) - Werner -- _________________________________________________________________________ / Werner Almesberger, Buenos Aires, Argentina wa@almesberger.net / /_http://www.almesberger.net/____________________________________________/