From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BdNsT-0004Hb-Pn for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 02:38:29 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BdNsT-0004HI-4a for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 02:38:29 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BdNsT-0004HF-1Z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 02:38:29 -0400 Received: from [212.11.36.58] (helo=www2.translationforge.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.34) id 1BdNqp-0005yN-SE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 24 Jun 2004 02:36:48 -0400 From: Jean-Michel POURE Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Clarification about qemu-fast (was segfaults in fc1) Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 08:36:40 +0200 References: <200406230805.16198.dcuny@lanset.com> <20040623165006.GA22835@jbrown.mylinuxbox.org> In-Reply-To: <20040623165006.GA22835@jbrown.mylinuxbox.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200406240836.41050.jm@poure.com> Reply-To: jm@poure.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Le mercredi 23 Juin 2004 18:50, Jim C. Brown a =E9crit : > That is not exactly true. Qemu works fine for me, even when I start it wh= en > I am offline. However I use VDE/tuntap and do have a local area network, = so > it is possible that qemu requires a network connection to function > correctly (IIRC since 0.5.5 qemu uses -user-net by default if it can not > access tuntap, and -dummy-net by default for earlier versions). Of course > tuntap requires that you have an actual ethernet card to work.... > > BTW if you are using the Windows port, you might be better off using > -dummy-net or -user-net ... I vaguely recall that one of the reasons > -user-net was introduced was because it was so hard to set up networking > with qemu when Windows was the host OS. Can anyone confirm the same problems with -user-net as described here: https://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?func=3Ddetailitem&item_id=3D9388 http://www.poure.com/screenshots/qemu_temp_6.png A Debian SID guest with user-net seems to loose network packets. On the=20 contrary, Tun networking works fine. Please note that this is not qemu-fast= =20 but qemu system emulator. Cheers, Jean-Michel