From: Jason Boxman <jasonb@edseek.com>
To: lartc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [LARTC] htb vs hsfc
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 20:21:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200406241621.02646.jasonb@edseek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40DB0D84.8050603@club-internet.fr>
On Thursday 24 June 2004 13:21, Vincent Perrier wrote:
> HTB versus HFSC, both qdisc offer the same kind of service,
> if you want to see comparative test results, go to
> http://www.rawsoft.org
> at the line "TEST RESULTS" you will find the results for
> a sharing test and a burst test.
> You will see that both qdisc are good.
Excellent information!
Thanks!
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-06-24 20:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-06-24 17:21 [LARTC] htb vs hsfc Vincent Perrier
2004-06-24 20:21 ` Jason Boxman [this message]
2004-06-25 1:51 ` Patrick McHardy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200406241621.02646.jasonb@edseek.com \
--to=jasonb@edseek.com \
--cc=lartc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.