All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: george@mvista.com
Cc: boris.hu@intel.com, drepper@redhat.com, adam.li@intel.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@digeo.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Bugfix for CLOCK_REALTIME absolute timer.
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 15:17:25 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040628151725.09b691e4.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40E094DB.9000702@mvista.com>

George Anzinger <george@mvista.com> wrote:
>
> Andrew,
> 
> Boris and I have kicked this around enough.  It think it is ready for prime time.
> 

>  static void schedule_next_timer(struct k_itimer *timr)
>  {
> ...
> +	do {
> +		seq = read_seqbegin(&xtime_lock);
> +		new_wall_to =	wall_to_monotonic;
> +		posix_get_now(&now);
> +	} while (read_seqretry(&xtime_lock, seq));
> +
> +	if (!list_empty(&timr->abs_timer_entry)) {
> +		spin_lock(&abs_list.lock);
> +		add_clockset_delta(timr, &new_wall_to);
> +	}
> +		    
>  	do {
>  		posix_bump_timer(timr);
>  	}while (posix_time_before(&timr->it_timer, &now));
>  
> +	if (!list_empty(&timr->abs_timer_entry))
> +		spin_unlock(&abs_list.lock);

The locking in here is a bit ugly.  Does the lock actually need to be held while
the timer is being bumped?

And what is the upper bound on that while loop?

>  	tmr->it_id = (timer_t)-1;
> +        INIT_LIST_HEAD(&tmr->abs_timer_entry);
>  	if (unlikely(!(tmr->sigq = sigqueue_alloc()))) {

The cat ate your tab key? ;)

> +	if (!list_empty(&timr->abs_timer_entry)) {
> +		spin_lock(&abs_list.lock);
> +		list_del_init(&timr->abs_timer_entry);
> +		spin_unlock(&abs_list.lock);
> +	}

This is repeated often.  Does it merit its own function?

> +static DECLARE_MUTEX(clock_was_set_lock);
> +#define mutex_enter(x) down(x)
> +#define mutex_enter_interruptable(x) down_interruptible(x)
> +#define mutex_exit(x) up(x)

Please open-code these operations.



  reply	other threads:[~2004-06-28 22:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-06-03  9:56 [PATCH] One possible bugfix for CLOCK_REALTIME timer Hu, Boris
2004-06-04  0:36 ` George Anzinger
2004-06-28 21:59 ` [PATCH] Bugfix for CLOCK_REALTIME absolute timer George Anzinger
2004-06-28 22:17   ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2004-06-28 22:55     ` George Anzinger
2004-06-29  4:48 ` George Anzinger
2004-06-29  4:57   ` Andrew Morton
2004-06-29  8:45     ` George Anzinger
2004-06-30 19:13     ` George Anzinger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040628151725.09b691e4.akpm@osdl.org \
    --to=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=adam.li@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@digeo.com \
    --cc=boris.hu@intel.com \
    --cc=drepper@redhat.com \
    --cc=george@mvista.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.