From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org>
Cc: debi.janos@freemail.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-net@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.7-mm1 - 2.6.7-mm4 weird http behavior
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 13:59:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040629135922.12384153.davem@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040629133501.3c2cd2a2@dell_ss3.pdx.osdl.net>
On Tue, 29 Jun 2004 13:35:01 -0700
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org> wrote:
> FYI - gentoo works for window scale 0..2 and appears to fail for >3.
>
> Also, the socket ends up with:
>
> State Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address:Port Peer Address:Port
> ESTAB 0 0 172.20.1.73:34452 198.63.211.232:http
> ts sack wscale:0,3 rto:332 rtt:66.375/50.5 cwnd:3
Yes, I've seen this declared in other reports too.
It probably means just that for window scales of 0..2 the misinterpretation
does not result in a too-small-to-send-data window.
But I'm still confused that the scaled window is being given to the
receiver, and this makes the connection freeze. I wonder if there is
a queer box doing NAT or similar in front of the gentoo machine which
either:
1) Applies any window scaling to both directions
2) Applies window scaling to the wrong direction
and uses this to "help" with dropping of out-of-window TCP segments.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-06-29 20:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-06-29 13:20 2.6.7-mm1 - 2.6.7-mm4 weird http behavior Debi Janos
2004-06-29 15:45 ` bert hubert
2004-06-29 16:57 ` Debi Janos
2004-06-29 17:28 ` bert hubert
[not found] ` <freemail.20040529200446.32881@fm2.freemail.hu>
2004-06-29 18:38 ` bert hubert
2004-06-29 18:47 ` Debi Janos
2004-06-29 22:46 ` Redeeman
2004-06-29 17:27 ` Jesse Stockall
2004-06-29 17:39 ` FabF
2004-06-29 18:22 ` Stephen Hemminger
2004-06-29 18:50 ` David S. Miller
2004-06-29 19:07 ` Debi Janos
2004-06-29 19:13 ` Jesse Stockall
2004-06-29 19:49 ` Stephen Hemminger
2004-06-29 19:54 ` David S. Miller
2004-06-29 20:35 ` Stephen Hemminger
2004-06-29 20:59 ` David S. Miller [this message]
2004-06-29 21:02 ` Stephen Hemminger
2004-06-29 21:36 ` John Heffner
2004-06-29 21:53 ` David S. Miller
2004-06-29 21:58 ` Martin Schlemmer
2004-06-30 8:04 ` Debi Janos
2004-06-30 8:04 ` Debi Janos
2004-06-30 20:14 ` David S. Miller
2004-06-30 20:20 ` John Heffner
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-06-29 18:40 Debi Janos
2004-06-29 22:39 ` Redeeman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040629135922.12384153.davem@redhat.com \
--to=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=debi.janos@freemail.hu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-net@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shemminger@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.