From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 12:59:21 -0700 From: Tom Rini To: "Robert P. J. Day" Cc: Embedded Linux PPC list Subject: Re: ok ... which source trees are the "right" choices? Message-ID: <20040629195920.GL28128@smtp.west.cox.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 11:12:16AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > based on wolfgang's recent reference to the linuxppc_2_4_devel > source tree at DENX, one has to ask -- how does one choose between the > various source trees to stay on top of things? First, as far as I'm concerned, 2.4 is a low priority. I'll forward patches on to Marcelo, but quite frankly, I don't see the point of trying to maintain additional trees (esp. given that most people looking for a public tree want DENX's tree). There _shouldn't_ be anything in the ppc.bkbits.net 2.4 trees that's not in stock kernel.org (if it is, it's almsot certainly in the DENX tree), but if there is, as I said, I'll pass things along. -- Tom Rini http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/